Which is worse: A scientifically ignorant candidate, or an economically ignorant candidate?
Hey, I have a great idea: Let's blast the current president for not cooperating enough with the rest of the world, but then at the same time promise a bunch of tariffs and import quotas. That won't anger anyone.
(Remember the original NAFTA debate, when Al Gore and Ross Perot went on CNN? This comes up any time there's a discussion of the most watched shows in cable TV history; I think one or two Monday Night Football games on ESPN have since surpassed it. Anyway, Gore was the voice of reason in that debate, and he so badly trounced Perot (at least in my opinion) that I never thought being a fervent free-trader would imply the need to support one party or the other.)
Posted by Matt Bruce at March 3, 2008 01:51 PMI don't like to pick, which is why I wanted Huckabee to win.
Posted by: ZD at March 4, 2008 10:37 PM